E-Waste Legislation in the US: An Analysis of the Disparate Design and Resulting Influence on Collection Rates across States
This 2021 article is from the academic peer-reviewed publication, the Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. This article primarily examines differences among e-waste recycling laws that exist in 25 different US states. The authors also touch upon the lack of international and national laws or regulations governing e-waste management in the US. As the authors note, the Basel Convention, an international treaty intended to regulate transboundary movement of hazardous waste, has yet to be signed or ratified by the US. Similarly, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which gives the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) power to restrict storage and disposal of "hazardous waste", does not classify most e-waste as "hazardous"., with the exception of cathode ray tubes (from TV's and monitors), which contain lead. The articles indicates that almost all of 25 states with e-waste laws are based on the "Extended Producer Responsibility" model that requires manufacturers to set-up an e-recycling program with individual states. The authors note that most states have different regulations governing the type of electronic equipment covered, fees charged, performance standards, agencies in charge of enforcement, public education requirements and more. In conclusion, it is suggested that federal legislation that is uniformly enforced among states would make it easier for manufacturers, recyclers and consumers to understand and comply with e-recycling policies.